|
|
 |

Related Links: Curriculum Module on Aging and Ethnicity
Prepared by Andrew E. Scharlach, Ph.D.
Esme Fuller-Thomson, MSW, Ph.D.
B. Josea Kramer, Ph.D.
University of California at Berkeley
School of Social Welfare
Berkeley, CA 94720-7400
With partial funding from the Academic Geriatric Resource Program
University of California at Berkeley
Preface
These curriculum materials provide a basic introduction to existing knowledge
regarding minority elderly in the United States. They are designed to provide
instructors with accurate information that can easily be integrated into
existing undergraduate and graduate-level courses, including courses in
social welfare, public health, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and
minority studies. In so doing, it is hoped that these materials will enhance
the quantity and quality of aging content in existing courses, so that students
can be better prepared for the intellectual and societal challenges facing
an aging and increasingly diverse
society.
The curriculum module on Minority Aging consists of five sections. The first
section, "Aging Among Minority Populations," provides an overview
of key issues in minority aging. Topics covered include diversity among
minority elders, demographic trends, life expectancy, economic status, health
conditions, and family relationships. The Overview is followed by separate
sections summarizing existing knowledge regarding older adults in four specific
minority groups: African-Americans, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders,
and American Indians.
The Overview and each of the following sections is accompanied by a reference
list, an annotated bibliography of suggested readings, a list of available
audiovisual materials, as well as an in-depth interview with a selected
expert regarding the particular racial or ethnic group. The interviews address
such issues as the unique characteristics of the elderly in each minority
group, the accuracy of popular stereotypes, the challenges faced by the
current cohort of older ethnic minority adults, and suggested approaches
to teaching students about minority issues. The five interviewees are: Percil
Stanford (Overview of Minority Aging), Charlotte Perry (African-American
Aging), Ramon Valle (Hispanic Aging), Barbara K. Yee (Asian/Pacific Islander
Aging), and Robert John (American Indian Aging).
Instructors are encouraged to adapt these materials as appropriate to their
particular needs. Some instructors may wish to utilize the information summaries
as a source of lecture material; others may wish to assign sections for
student reading and discussion. These materials also may be useful as background
reading for students and professors new to this topic. However, they are
used, it is hoped that these materials will stimulate increased interest
in and knowledge about aging among minority groups in the United States.
For further information regarding how these materials can best be utilized,
instructors are welcome to contact Professor Andrew Scharlach at the School
of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley.
Also being developed as part of this project are curriculum modules summarizing
information regarding a number of other aging-related topics, including
the following: (1) Demographic characteristics of an aging society; (2)
Myths and stereotypes about aging; (3) The aging process; (4) Women and
aging. These curriculum modules are available from the Center on Aging,
535 University Hall, University of California at Berkeley, or from Professor
Scharlach at the School of Social Welfare.
Development of these curriculum materials was made possible by grants from
the Office of Educational Development, the Media Resource Center, the Academic
Geriatric Education Program, the American Cultures Program, and the Eugene
and Rose Kleiner Chair for the Study of Aging Processes, Practices and Policies.
Andrew Scharlach, Professor of Social Welfare and holder of the Kleiner
Chair in Aging at the University of California at Berkeley, coordinated
all aspects of the project. Esme Fuller-Thomson, now at the University of
Toronto School of Social Work, conducted extensive literature reviews regarding
the various minority elderly populations. B. Josea Kramer, now at the Sepulveda
Veterans Administration Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education, and
Clinical Center, made significant revisions in the information summaries,
and conducted the interviews with the five expert informants. We would like
to express our appreciation to Kris Duermeier, graduate student in the School
of Social Welfare at Berkeley, who updated census data and made final editorial
corrections. We also are indebted to the numerous faculty members in Social
Welfare and other departments who took the time to review earlier drafts
and make suggestions designed to increase the usefulness of these materials.
Table of Contents
Overview: Aging Among Minority Populations
- Information summary
- References
- Interview with E. Percil Stanford, Director
National Resource Center on Minority Aging
University Center on Aging
San Diego State University
- Suggested Readings
- Audiovisual Resources
- Information summary
- References
- Interview with Charlotte Perry
Medical Anthropology Department
UC San Francisco
Suggested Readings
Audiovisual Resources
- Information summary
- References
- Interview with Ramon Valle, Professor
School of Social Work
College of Health & Human Services
San Diego State University
- Suggested Readings
Audiovisual Resources
- Information summary
- References
- Interview with Barbara W. K. Yee, Associate Professor
University of Texas, Medical Brance at Galveston
- Suggested Readings
- Audiovisual Resources
- Information summary
- References
- Interview with Robert John, Associate Scientist
Gerontology Center, University of Kansas
- Suggested Readings
- Audiovisual Resources
Aging Among Minority Populations:
An Overview
Information Summary
Introduction
The U.S. population is aging dramatically. Already the number of persons
over the age of 65 living in the U.S. is greater than the entire population
of Canada. According to the 1990 U.S. Census, an estimated 31.6 million
persons were age 65 or older, representing one in eight Americans. By the
year 2030, the number of persons 65 or older is expected to more than double
to 66 million, or one in five Americans.
Minority persons constitute the fastest growing segment of the elderly population.
The number of minority group elderly is expected to increase more than 500%
by the middle of the next century, from 4.3 million persons in 1990 to 22.5
million by the year 2050. Whereas minority elders currently represent only
10% of all older adults, they will account for more than 15% of older persons
by 2020 and more than 21% of older persons by 2050. Although Whites will
continue to represent the majority of the aged population, minority elderly
will become "an even larger and more important component of the aging
of America" (Angel and Hogan, 1991:1).
This Overview provides a summary of key issues in minority aging. Topics
covered include diversity among minority elders, demographic trends, life
expectancy, economic status, health conditions, and family relationships.
The Overview is followed by separate sections summarizing existing information
regarding older adults in four general minority groups: African-Americans,
Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and American Indians.
The Overview and each of the following sections is accompanied by an in-depth
interview with a selected expert regarding a particular minority elderly
population. The five interviews converge on a number of key points: (1)
Existing theories of the aging process do not adequately address cultural
factors; (2) There is great diversity within as well as between ethnic groups;
(3) There is a tremendous need for additional research; (4) We need to acknowledge
how little we actually know about each other; (5) Minority aging presents
a wide field of opportunities both for scholarship and for career development
in the social and health sciences.
Who are the Minority Elderly?
Minority elderly persons are generally identified as members of four non-European
populations: African-American, Hispanic, Native American, and Asian/Pacific
Islander. Amendments to the Older Americans
Act in 1987 focused national attention on the needs of these groups by mandating
that services be targeted to those in greatest social and economic need,
particularly minority elderly. These minority categories represent diverse,
heterogeneous populations. The category of Asian/Pacific Islander, for example,
embraces numerous distinct cultural groups, including native and foreign-born
Americans from diverse backgrounds such as Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino,
Samoan, and refugee Hmong and Mien peoples. The category of Native American
includes the extremely heterogeneous population of American Indians, Aleuts,
and Iniuts from approximately 278 federally recognized reservations, 500
tribes, bands or Native Villages, and 100 non-recognized tribes.
Definitions of the four ethnic minority categories are generally accepted
across disciplines but are not absolute. Native Hawaiians, for example,
are considered an Asian/Pacific Islander population by demographers; however,
since 1987, policy makers have included Native Hawaiians under the category
of Native Americans/ Alaskan Natives with regard to the funding provisions
of Title VI of the Older Americans Act.
The Hispanic category is unified by linguistic and some cultural traditions,
although it includes significant differences between Puerto Rican, Cuban,
Latin American, Mexican and Central American populations. While the other
three minority groups may also represent broad racial groups, persons of
Hispanic origin may be of any race.
While the heterogeneity of Native American, Asian/Pacific, and Hispanic
populations may seem obvious, the heterogeneity in the African-American
population should not be overlooked (Jackson, 1988). Differences among elderly
African-Americans, based largely on life experience, are reflective of the
great variation in the American experience among rural and urban lifestyles,
geographic regions and socio-economic conditions.
Dramatic Growth in the Numbers of Minority Elders
The population of minority elderly is expected to increase 500% in the next
55 years. While fewer than one in ten minority persons are now elderly,
by the year 2050 the proportion will increase to one in five. Already, the
fastest growing segment of the African-American population is composed of
those persons over the age of 65, and the number of Afro-American elderly
increased 21% between 1980 and 1990. The number of Hispanic elderly grew
64% between 1980 and 1990. The biggest growth is expected to occur among
the "oldest old," those who are 85 years of age and older.
The projected changes in the number of minority elders from 1990 to 2050
are shown in Table 1 (taken from Taeuber, 1990):
Table 1
Projected Growth of Minority Populations, Age 65+
|
|
1990
|
2050 |
| Blacks |
2.6 million
|
9.6 million |
| Other Races (Not White or Black)
|
600,000
|
5.0 million |
| Hispanic (any race)
|
1.1 million
|
7.9 million |
Perspectives on Minority Aging
Two hypotheses which describe minority aging have received considerable
attention. The "double jeopardy" hypothesis argues that minority
elderly are at a double disadvantage in American society, particularly with
regard to economic status and health (Dowd & Bengston, 1978; Jackson,
1968). Minority elders are discriminated against by virtue of being a member
of a minority group and by being identified as aged in an agist society.
However, a review of various studies of the double jeopardy concept (Jackson,
1985a) found the hypothesis to have limited theoretical or empirical validity,
despite its usefulness as an advocacy concept.
A competing perspective, the "age as leveler" hypothesis, maintains
that differences in status between minority and Anglo populations are reduced
over the course of a lifetime, particularly as both groups experience similar
problems and societal barriers in old age (Kent, 1971). Analyses of inter-group
differences in later life are generally consistent with the predictions
of the "age as leveler" hypothesis (Markides, 1983). Differences
between African-Americans and Anglos with regard to income and health, for
example, tend to decline from middle age to old age.
As noted in the accompanying interviews with leading experts in the field
of minority aging, many contemporary researchers find these and other theoretical
formulations unsatisfactory because they tend to ignore the experience and
effect of cultural factors. "Diversity in aging" is now being
considered in a new light (Bass, Kutza & Torres-Gil, 1990; Stanford
& Torres-Gil, 1991). The use of a Euro-American standard model from
which other populations deviate is now rejected. Diversity is taken to include
not only a multi-ethnic perspective, but also the many individual and social
differences that are related to the aging process.
Ethnic and cultural diversity are woven into American society. Within any
minority group there are differences in individual status with regard to
health, housing, marital status, social network, income, etc. These differences
cut across all social categories.
- America can acknowledge its diversity and accept the challenge to
develop a new language that validates and affirms differences as an essential
part of the economic and social fabric of one's society. America's diversity
is not a melting pot, and it may but be a "mosaic" or a "tossed
salad." How our diversity will be characterized, named, and tolerated
is as much a challenge in gerontology as in other disciplines. (Stanford
& Yee, 1991:22)
Life Expectancy and Racial Mortality Cross-over
Minorities tend to have shorter life expectancies than do Anglos. In 1986
the average U.S. life expectancy at birth was 74.8 years. The average life
expectancy of a minority individual was 69.2 years, more than five years
less (Harper, 1991). However, those African-Americans and Hispanic persons
who do survive to old age tend to live longer than their Anglo counterparts
(Wing et al., 1985). This "mortality cross-over" phenomenon has
not been found among Japanese, Chinese, or Native American populations (Harper,
1991).
Although there are no definitive answers explaining this crossover phenomenon,
one suggestion is that early mortality selects the least hardy individuals,
leaving among the older cohort a disproportionate population of more hardy
persons who have been successful in coping with stress throughout their
lifetime (Greene & Siegler, 1984). In any case, this phenomenon is an
indication that chronological age may not be an adequate measure in developing
policies to meet the needs of older adults (Jackson, 1985b; Markides &
Machalek, 1984).
Economic Status
Despite substantial decreases in the poverty rate of America's senior citizens
over the last twenty years, the incidence of poverty among minority elders
remains high. Whereas the 1990 Census found 10.1% of older Anglos living
in poverty, 33.8% of elderly African-Americans lived in poverty as did 22.5%
of older persons of Hispanic origin (Chen, 1991). Data from the 1990 Census
also indicated that the percentage of older American Indians living in poverty
ranged from 21.3% in urban areas to 37.5% in rural and/or reservation areas.
Higher poverty rates among minority elders result from a combination of
factors over the life course: inadequate education, discrimination in hiring
and rates of pay, work histories of low wage jobs, high unemployment, and
intermittent employment. Frequent and/or extended periods of unemployment
or underemployment create immediate financial hardship and reduce the possibility
of adequate pension benefits. Because Social Security payments are based
on a person's average yearly income including incomeless years, periods
of unemployment reduce monthly benefits eligibility.
Many minority elders worked at manual labor, domestic service, and/or temporary
or part-time jobs that offered neither pensions nor social security benefits.
Moreover, low paid workers had little opportunity to accumulate assets on
which to live in their later years. Savings provide a major source of income
for 72% of all households of elderly Anglos, in contrast to only 27% of
elderly African-American households and 37% of elderly Hispanic households
(Chen, 1991).
Health
Minority elders experience higher rates of morbidity and mortality than
do Anglo elders. Seventeen percent of African-American elders and 11% of
Hispanic elders rate their health as poor, as compared with 7% of Anglo
elders. Even when controlling for income, minority elders in 1976 had an
average of 58 days on which their activity was restricted due to health
reasons as opposed to an average of 45 days for Anglos (Manuel, 1982).
Risk factors contributing to greater morbidity and mortality among minority
elders include higher rates of smoking, poor nutrition, inadequate housing,
and reduced access to or use of health care services. These differences
are largely attributable to a number of social, economic and political realities:
increased poverty among minority elders, lack of adequate health care throughout
life, and a greater likelihood of working at manual jobs that are potentially
physically debilitating. Moreover, despite more problematic health conditions
on average, older minority members are less likely than Anglo elders to
have health insurance or to visit a doctor.
The rates of mortality and morbidity for specific diseases vary among the
various racial or ethnic groups. The current level of research does not
readily allow comparisons across groups, however the following are some
important variations:
- - American Indian elders tend to experience aging-related physical,
psychological and social changes at much younger ages than do non-Indians
(NICOA, 1981). The characteristics associated with Anglos of age 65 often
are found among urban elders at age 55 and among reservation elders at age
45. Heart disease recently has become the leading cause of death among Indian
elders, perhaps as a result of the increasing incidence of diabetes and
non-traditional behaviors such as habitual and excessive use of tobacco,
poor dietary practices, and increased levels of life stressors (Rhoades,
1991).
-
- - Gillum and Liu (1984) note that American Blacks have the highest rate
of mortality due to coronary heart disease of any population in the world.
Since many of the risk factors for heart disease can be modified, there
is hope that its incidence can be reduced for this population (Harper &
Alexander, 1991:203).
-
- - The first national assessment of the health of older Hispanics, conducted
under the auspices of the Asociacion Nacional por Personas Mayores, found
that 73% of Hispanic elderly reported impaired activities as a result of
their health conditions (LaCayo, 1980). Data on specific diseases awaits
the completion of the national Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (HHANES).
-
- - Chinese and Japanese Americans have lower mortality rates and longer
life expectancies than do Anglos (Markides & Mindel, 1987). Data remain
scarce on health issues affecting Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
(Harper, 1991). However, adoption of majority U.S. lifestyles appears to
be having a negative impact on health. The higher sodium diet in the U.S.,
for example, has been associated with increased rates of hypertension and
arteriosclerotic disease (Liu, 1985).
It is noteworthy that the higher proportion of health problems among minority
elders do not lead to higher institutionalization rates for this population.
In fact, a much smaller percentage of non-white (3%) than Anglo (5.8%) elderly
live in nursing homes. Reasons for this difference include discrimination
in referrals to long term care services, geographical separation from support
networks, potential linguistic isolation, shorter life spans for most minority
individuals, and greater involvement of families and other unpaid sources
of assistance (Manuel, 1982). In addition, some ethnic groups place high
value on caring for elderly members within the family context and/or attach
a social stigma to institutionalization.
Communal and Religious Participation
Religion and peer support are important resources for many minority elders.
Strong communal support systems have developed for many minority groups
as a reaction to discrimination and to facilitate support, interaction and
functioning among group members. These economic, emotional and social support
systems often are particularly important for elderly persons, especially
those who are foreign born and have limited English language skills. The
church often occupies a central role in the provision of support within
minority communities. It provides a political structure for helping minority
group members, particularly Hispanics and Afro-Americans, to deal with "social,
economic, and political inequities" (George, 1988); it provides a mutual
aid system to provide economic, emotional and spiritual assistance to a
disenfranchised population; and, it provides an opportunity for minority
elders to perform meaningful roles that are valued by their community.
Family
Research on all four minority populations documents the traditional and
cultural importance of the family in providing informal support to elderly
members. Minority families often have developed and retain distinctive models
of interaction that combine traditional patterns of roles and responsibilities
with adaptations called forth by the American experience.
Among African American families, intergenerational relationships have been
found to be extremely significant (Mutran, 1985); the American Indian elder
is considered the "heart and soul" of family and tradition (Lyons,
1978; Red Horse, 1980); Confucian ideals of filial piety influence many
Asian families (Koh and Bell, 1987); and, an intergenerational compact underlies
relationships in Hispanic families (Markides and Krause, 1985).
Afro-American, Hispanic and Native American families have traditionally
been structured to involve at least three generations. The grandparents
frequently see their role as passing on the traditions and heritage of the
culture, including the teaching of Spanish language skills in Hispanic families.
In addition, grandparents may act as surrogate parents when parents work
outside the home, are disabled, or are otherwise unavailable (Barresi, 1987).
Generalizations about family support among minority groups must be tempered
with the knowledge that the family's resources often are scarce and inconsistent
(Manson, 1990). The realities of family diversity and of the barriers to
accessing formal support systems belie the simple belief that minority families
"take care of their own" (Lockery, 1991). Immigrant families may
have particular difficulty dealing with the potential "generation gap"
between grandparents and grandchildren who may speak different languages
and have different beliefs and expectations regarding filial piety.
Cultural values regarding the provision of care to older family members
also are being challenged by demographic forces which affect the entire
society. Declining birth rates, increasing female labor force participation,
decreasing rates of marriage, increasing rates of divorce, wide-spread unemployment,
and abuse of drugs and alcohol all limit the number of persons available
to provide care and assistance to increasing numbers of older family members
(Antonucci and Cantor, 1991). As the number of adults living longer lives
continues to increase, this will be a challenge throughout the entire society.
Approaches to the Study of Minority Aging
To date, most research regarding the elderly has focused on the majority
Euro-American population. However, as current demographic trends have become
more widely recognized, there has been increasing attention to the special
needs of minority elders in the United States.
- The available data, while limited, are sufficient to convince even
a critical observer that race and ethnicity affect the health and welfare
of elderly minority group members. Unfortunately, the existing data can
tell us neither why nor what interventions might improve the status of older
minority people. (Gerontological Society of America, 1991:vii)
Many studies of minority aging compare minority elders to an Anglo standard,
largely ignoring intragroup heterogeneity. In so doing, they gloss over
the dimensions of culture which distinguish the various ethnic groups that
comprise the minority elderly. This approach ignores the positive experi
ence of participating in an
ethnic minority community in which shared cultural values facilitate individual
adjustment to aging (see for instance studies on the anthropology of aging
in Sokolovsky, 1990, or Myerhoff and Simic, 1978). In addition, focusing
on minorities as social classes within a stratified society can contribute
to a deficit model that views minority status only in terms of discrimination
and exclusion (Holtzberg, 1982).
Conclusion
The cohort of minority persons who are now elderly has experienced a unique
history, typically including substantial family and social involvement,
problems associated with immigrant status, as well as great perseverance
in the face of racism and institutionalized prejudice. The unique assets
and problems of minority elders have, to a large extent, been ignored by
mainstream social scientists, policy makers and service providers. There
is a need for accurate, relevant knowledge regarding minority elders in
order to assure that the needs of all older persons are adequately met and
understood.
References
Angel, J. L., & Hogan, D. P. (1991). "The Demography of Minority
Populations." In Minority Elders: Longevity, Economics and Health,
Building a Public Policy Base (pp. 1-13). Washington, DC: Gerontological
Society of America.
Antonucci, A. C., & Cantor, M. H. (1991). "Strengthening the Family
Support System of Older Minority Persons." In Minority Elders: Longevity,
Economics and Health, Building a Public Policy Base (pp. 32-37). Washington,
DC: Gerontological Society of America.
Bass, S. A., Kutza, E. A., & Torres-Gil, F. M. (Eds.). (1990). Diversity
in Aging. Glencoe, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Chen, Y-P. (1991). "Improving Economic Security of Minority Persons
As They Enter Old Age." In Minority Elders: Longevity, Economics
and Health, Building a Public Policy Base (pp. 14-23). Washington, DC:
Gerontological Society of America.
Dowd, J. J., & Bengston, V. L. (1978). "Aging in Minority Populations:
An Examination of the Double Jeopardy Hypothesis." Journal of Gerontology,
33, 427-436.
Gillum, R., & Liu, K. C. (1984). "Coronary Heart Disease Mortality
Among United States Blacks, 1940-1978: Trends and Unanswered Questions."
American Heart Journal, 108, 728-732.
Harper, M. S. (1991). Introduction. In M. S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging:
Essential Curricula Content for Selected Health and Allied Professions.
Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services. DHHS Publication No. HRS (P-DV-90-4). Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
Harper, M. S., & Alexander, C. E. (1991). "Profile of the Black
Elderly." In M. S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging: Essential Curricula
Content for Selected Health and Allied Professions. Health Resources
and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS
Publication No. HRS (P- DV-90-4). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office.
Holtzberg, C. S. (1982). "Ethnicity and Aging: Anthropological Perspectives
On More Than Just the Minority Elderly." The Gerontologist,
22, 249-257.
Jackson, J. J. (1985a). "Double Jeopardy Re-examined." Journal
of Minority Aging, 10, 25-61.
Jackson, J. J. (1985b). "Race, National Origin, Ethnicity and Aging."
In R. H. Binstock and E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and Social
Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 78-84). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Jackson, J. J. (1970). "Aged Negroes: Their Cultural Departures From
Statistical Stereotypes and Rural-Urban Differences." The Gerontologist,
10, 140-145.
Jackson, J. S. (1988). Black American Elderly. New York: Springer.
Kent, D. P. (1971). "The Elderly in Minority Groups: Variant Patterns
of Aging," The Gerontologist, 11, 26-29.
Koh, J. Y., & Bell, W. G. (1987). "Korean Elders in the United
States: Intergenerational Relations and Living Arrangements." The
Gerontologist, 27, 66-71.
LaCayo, C. G. (1980). A National Study to Assess the Service Needs of
the Hispanic Elderly. Los Angeles: Asociacion Nacional por Personas
Mayores.
Liu, W. T. (1985). "Asian Pacific Elderly: Mortality Differentials,
Health Status and Use of Health Services." Journal of Applied Gerontology,
4, 35-64.
Lockery S. A. (1991). "Caregiving Among Racial and Ethnic Minority
Elders." Generations, 15(4), 58-62.
Lyons, J. P. (1978). The Indian Elders: The Forgotten American. Final
Report of the First National Indian Council on Aging Conference, 1976.
Washington, DC: National Tribal Chairmen Association.
Manson, S. M. (1990). "Older American Indians: Status and Issues in
Income, Housing and Health." In Aging and Old Age in Diverse Populations
(pp. 17-40). Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.
Markides, K. S. (1982). "Ethnicity and Aging: A Comment." The
Gerontologist, 22, 467-472.
Markides, K. S., & Krause, N. (1985). "Intergenerational Solidarity
and Psychological Well-Being Among Older Mexican Americans: A Three Generations
Study." Journal of Gerontology, 40, 390-392.
Markides, K. S., & Machalek, R. (1984). "Selective Survival, Aging
and Society." Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 32,
207-222.
Markides, K. S., & Mindel, C. H. (1987). Aging and Ethnicity.
Beverly Hills: Sage.
Morrison, B. J., & Gresson III, A. D. (1991). "Curriculum Content
Pertaining to Black Elderly for Selected Health Care Professions."
In M. S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging: Essential Curricula Content for
Selected Health and Allied Professions. Health Resources and Services
Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication
No. HRS (P-DV-90-4). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Mutran, E. (1985). "Intergenerational Family Support Among Blacks and
Whites: Response to Culture or to Socioeconomic Differences." Journal
of Gerontology, 40, 383-389.
Myerhoff, B. G., & Simic, A. (Eds.). (1978). Life's Career -Aging:
Cultural Variations on Growing Old. Beverly Hills: Sage.
National Indian Council On Aging. (1981). American Indian Elderly: A
National Profile. Albuquerque, NM: National Indian Council on Aging.
RedHorse, J. G. (1980). "American Indian Elders: Unifiers of Indian
Families." Social Casework, 61, 491-493.
Rhoades, E. R. (1991). "Profile of American Indians and Alaskan Natives."
In M. S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging: Essential Curricula Content for
Selected Health and Allied Professions. Health Resources and Services Administration,
Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication No. HRS (P-DV-90-4).
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Sokolovsky, J. (1990). The Cultural Context of Aging: Worldwide Perspectives.
New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Stanford, E. P., & Torres-Gil, F. M. (Eds.). (1991). "Diversity:
New Approaches to Ethnic Minority Aging." Generations, 15(4).
Taeuber, C. (1990). "Diversity: The Dramatic Reality." In S. A.
Bass, E. A. Kutza, & F. M. Torres-Gil (Eds.), Diversity in Aging.
Glencoe, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Wing, S., Manton, K. G., Stallard, E., Haines, C. G., & Tyroles, H.
A. (1985). "The Black/White Mortality Cross-Over: Investigation in
a Community Based Study." Journal of Gerontology, 40,
78-84.
Minority Elderly
Based on an interview with Percil Stanford, Director,
National Resource Center on Minority Aging
University Center on Aging, San Diego State University.
Who are the "minority elderly"?
Minority older persons are those persons who are underserved and in many
instances economically deprived. Some years ago, we had to narrow down the
definition to be consistent with the civil rights definition: African American
or Black, the Hispanic or Chicano or Latino, the American Indian and the
Asian/Pacific Islanders. About six or seven years ago it became clear that
these particular groups were still the target groups. But, we've gotten
more individuals from some of the Eastern European countries who are also
showing some of the same needs in terms of services, language needs, and
diet. So we've had to pay more attention to a broader kind of concern than
color and race and deal with cultural tradition
and value systems, or ethnicity. So more and more we talk about ethnic as
well as minority older persons.
Most of the time ethnic minority persons are not effective or politically
powerful enough to make a difference in the political agenda. So I think
that's very definitely a defining factor. Another aspect that we just don't
deal with, and I don't see any signs of dealing with, is racism. Historical
racism underlies much of the inattention to older minorities, not only from
those who are in a position to make a difference, but also from the reactions
of older people. The real tragedy is that we expect minority older people
to somehow become involved in doing things that will empower their own plight,
when in most instances they have been denied the pathway to do anything
to enhance their own plight, over and over for years. So it's very difficult
for them to automatically, or to just suddenly, take the position to step
forward and say "I'm going to be a spokesperson. I'm going to speak
out. I'm going to make a difference." I think those are some of the
underlying things that make a difference in terms of who those individuals
are that might be labeled as minority.
What is the popular image of minority elders?
Outside of AARP's image of a rainbow collection of older people, I don't
see much being done to foster any kind of public image of the underserved
ethnic minority older people. It's still kind of a hidden group of individuals.
When people talk about the minority aged quite often the image is an older
black person. And when you question them further they will say, "oh,
yeah, that's who I'm talking about," or "Oh no, I'm really talking
about two groups: Hispanic, and black or African American." Very seldom
is there the notion that the category minority collectively includes the
groups that I've mentioned.
I think, with the language in the Older Americans Act which dealt with targeting
services to low income and minority aged, there was a resurgence of attention
to minority concerns. But I see a backing away from putting money into programs.
I wouldn't say that there was any kind of drive on the part of politicians
and legislators and others to include the minority older person under "the
umbrella." I think part of what has happened is that older people themselves
have indicated the need to pay more attention to their basic needs in their
particular communities. So I think recent interest in minority aging is
more from the ground up, rather than from any kind of real political agenda.
Even from a research standpoint, there has been very little effort, except
maybe in the last two years, to really address an agenda that would take
aggressive action toward highlighting minority research. The major effort
recently has come through the National Institute on Aging looking at some
specific issues related to long-term care and Alzheimer's Disease.
What public policies particularly impact minority elders?
Basic policies affecting older minorities include the Older Americans Act:
Title III (the social support services) or Title VII (the nutrition program).
There have been situations where programs were not accepted by the Feds
because they didn't meet all the criteria for appropriate nutrition programs.
In fact, given the conditions and the circumstances, the equipment and training
of individuals in those minority communities were adequate in terms
of their needs. There were no adjustments for the particular cultural values
and expectations even for nutrition programs. In some of the American Indian
communities, for example, the expectation was that if there was food available,
then according to their particular
cultures it was not to be reserved just for the old. It was to be used for
the children as well. When you look at a broader issue of targeting, up
until the last couple of years, there has been very little attention given
to the distribution of funds for programs and projects. So now that's being
addressed a little bit better.
What are the greatest service needs of minority elders?
I think one of the major things that needs to happen now is to look at some
of the issues around employment. There are a lot of older people who are
in need of some kind of supplementary income. Many of the individuals in
this group have not had jobs that would even provide social security. Another
issue is how well-prepared are they to be involved in job situations that
would require a certain level of literacy. We talk about the growing number
of older persons in minority ranks and the fact that older people are going
to be increasingly more visible in the workforce, but we don't stop and
assess very carefully who those people are going to be and what their preparation
is. Training for effective participation in the job market is very critical.
Another area that has a tremendous impact on this group is being victims
of crime in their own neighborhoods. We know for a fact that the crime rates
are quite often higher in some of the areas where minority elder people
reside, so it is somewhat prohibitive for them to get out and participate
without fear.
Retirement is basically a misnomer for minority older people. The majority
in fact never retire. Most of the individuals that we look at are people
who have gone from job to job and haven't had the benefit of any kind of
systematic retirement or pension plan. So most, I would say probably 60%
or more, may use the word "retirement" but are saying that they
have reached an age, but do not necessarily have the benefits or the wherewithal
to assume the retired role. So I would say that the situation in a nutshell
is that we have terminology that doesn't meet with fact.
What special challenges are faced by today's minority elders?
The current generation of minority elders probably is not going to be tremendously
different from the next cohort. We would like to think that they would;
but, if you stop and think about the next cohort, those will be people who
are probably right now in their early sixties. These are individuals who
were born in the early 1930's or when the country was coming out of the
Depression. These are still people who have been subject to a lot of laws
and reprisals because of their race and ethnicity. I don't think you are
going to see much difference between cohorts until you get to the baby boom
generation. These individuals, not the majority but a substantial number,
will exhibit more of the traits of the mainstream society elders. That will
include better economic opportunities and perhaps better retirement lifestyles
in a true sense. But that's another generation down the road. And then after
that group, I think we're going to be back to where this current cohort
is to a great extent, because the kinds of economic and social supports
that the baby boom generation has received, would have been and have been
withdrawn to a great extent. So you are going back to another deprived cohort
where there is a struggle to have full participation in our various societal
systems.
What do students most need to understand about minority elders?
I think one of the first things that instructors and teachers have to do,
is to compare themselves to the minority older persons that they are teaching
about to understand their similarities and their differences. Understand
that there are some cultural differences that they won't understand immediately
and not be afraid to explore those differences. Then once that exploration
has taken place, it's important to work with the students to highlight the
fact that there are some basic differences. Contrary to what we've thought
over the years, we're not going to automatically have a melting pot in this
society. There may be some assimilation and acculturation; but, for the
foreseeable future, we're going to have multiple cultures which need to
co-exist.
Having said that, I think the focus needs to be on understanding the true
history of the minority groups. I think the celebration of Columbus Day
is a good example. We say that Columbus discovered America when in fact
American Indians were here for years. Well, when you stop to look at the
ridiculous nature of that, it's a powerful statement as to the disregard
for human beings that occupied a territory. We need to understand, and to
make students understand, how the African-American population was integrated
into this land. And look at that for what it is, and what it was, and how
that has unfolded. The succeeding groups, Hispanics and Asian/Pacific Islanders,
had their roles in building this country. So all of that, then, would serve
to put some reality into the existence of different groups in our society.
Deal with the stereotypes and understand what the stereotypes are. Have
people ask themselves very carefully how they have come about the stereotypes
that they have. Whether it's first hand, second hand, or tertiary. Get students
to acknowledge that they, in fact, quite often don't know very much about
the reality of other groups, only the stereotype.
Older people are a tremendous resource that we don't use enough. The minority
older person is a very good resource that we need to take more advantage
of in a positive way. We need to set up situations where students can interface
with minority older persons, learn from them, and have a chance to see them
as real people. We need to get students to a point where they can appreciate
the beauty of the differences which many older people bring to a situation
rather than saying, "it's not like me," or "not like what
I know," and therefore it's not good.
I think the other thing that is very important to stress is that intragroup
variations are very important, yet they often get ignored in the emphasis
on inter-group affairs. Too often, we use mainstream EuroAmerican vs. all
other non-EuroAmerican groups as our primary context for examining issues.
In doing so, we may ignore some very real concerns from an intra-ethnic
and minority standpoint.
Suggested Readings
American Association of Retired Persons (AARP). (1987). A Portrait of
Older Minorities. Washington, DC: AARP.
This is a comprehensive, concise overview of sociodemographic characteristics
of minority elders in the United States. Included is information on demography,
marital status, living arrangements, education, employment, income and health.
American Society on Aging (ASA). (1992). Serving Elders of Color: Challenges
to Providers and the Aging Networks. San Francisco, CA: ASA.
This report provides a concise overview of the demographic and social trends
affecting elders of color, their role as a resource in their communities
and the country, and the problems and barriers they face. The report discusses
an approach to change based on a commitment to empowerment of elders of
color, and concludes with suggestions for future directions for improving
the status of elderly persons of color.
Angel, Jacqueline L., & Hogan, Dennis P. (1992). "The demography
of minority aging populations." Journal of Family History, 17,
95-115.
This article examines historical and demographic trends in the ethnic and
racial composition of older cohorts in the United States. It projects future
trends in the relative size of different racial and ethnic populations,
considers their likely impact on family structure, and discusses implications
for social policy and for the welfare of the minority elderly in the 21st
century.
Gelfand, Donald, & Barresi, Charles. (1987). Ethnic Dimensions of
Aging. New York: Springer. This edited volume examines the interrelationships
between ethnicity and aging from the perspective of leading researchers
and practitioners. The volume includes chapters on theoretical issues related
to ethnicity and aging, examples of conceptually grounded research on various
ethnic groups, and practice and policy implications. This is an important
book, which does an excellent job of summarizing many key issues regarding
the ways in which aging and ethnicity interact in the lives of individuals
and society.
Gerontological Society of America (1991). Minority Elders: Longevity,
Economics and Health, Building a Public Policy Base. Washington, DC:
GSA. Background papers on demography, income, social support and health
status review current state-of-the art knowledge and include findings on
the 1990 U.S. Census. A fifth paper provides excellent background on American
Indian Aging.
Harper, Mary S. (1990). Minority Aging: Essential Curricula Content for
Selected Health and Allied Professions. Health Resources and Services
Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication
No. HRS (P-DV-90-4). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
This volume provides an excellent overview on each of the four minority
populations in terms of demography, health status and cultural background.
Focusing on health care, the collection has applied research to recommendations
for improving health status and health car within each group.
Kramer, B. Josea, & Barker, Judith C. (1991). "Ethnic Diversity
in Aging and Aging Services in the U.S." Journal of Cross Cultural
Gerontology, 6(2).
This special issue is devoted to research on smaller ethnic populations
located mainly in California.
Markides, Kyriakos S. (1983). "Minority Aging." In Mathilda W.
Riley, Beth B. Hess, and Kathleen Bond (Eds.), Aging in Society (pp.
115-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
This article provides an excellent review of research regarding the "double
jeopardy" versus "age as leveler" perspectives on minority
status and aging. Markides compares the two perspectives in terms of their
ability to explain existing knowledge about Afro-American, Hispanic and
Anglo elders with regard to income, health, primary group relations, and
psychological well-being. This chapter will undoubtedly promote class discussion.
Sokolovsky, Jay. (1990). "Bring Culture Back Home: Aging, Ethnicity,
and Family Support." In Jay Sokolovsky (Ed.), The Cultural Context
of Aging (pp. 201-212). New York: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.
This chapter provides a concise overview of family and community involvement
of minority elders. It argues that public policy has relied too heavily
on family-based "informal support systems" for service provision
to the minority elderly, and that family support must be coupled with publicly
funded non-familial systems of care to avoid inadequacies in service delivery
and excessive demands on minority families.
Stanford, E. Percil, & Torres-Gil, Fernando. (Eds.). (1991, Fall). "Diversity:
New Approaches to Ethnic Minority Aging." Generations, 15(4).
This entire issue of Generations, the journal of the American Society on
Aging, is devoted to a variety of new approaches to policy and planning
to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and heterogenous aging society.
Of special interest to Californians will by Hayes-Bautista's article on
young Latinos, older Anglos, and public policy.
Stoller, Eleanor P., & Gibson, Rose C. (Eds.). (1994). Worlds of
Difference: Inequality in the Aging Experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine
Forge Press.
This anthology includes a rich mosaic of selections - some scholarly, some
fictional, some autobiographical - representing diverse experiences of the
aging process. Major sections of the book address race, class, and gender
differences among older adults with regard to (1) life course and cohort
influences, (2) cultural images about old age, (3) productive activity in
late life, (4) family diversity, and (5) health and mortality. Whether read
selectively or as a whole, this anthology provides a stimulating and provocative
introduction to the topic of aging and diversity.
Yeo, Gwen, & Hikoyeda, Nancy. (1992). Cohort Analysis as a Clinical
and Educational Tool in Ethnogeriatrics: Historical Profiles of Chinese,
Filipino, Mexican and African American Elders. Stanford, CA: Stanford
Geriatric Education Center.
This monograph provides historical profiles of American elders from four
racial/ethnic groups. Each profile traces some of the major periods and
events in each group's history since coming to the United States. Major
historical periods also are examined in terms of the approximate age at
which today's elders may have experienced them, making this an extremely
useful resource for gaining an overview of how ethnicity-related historical
events have influenced the lives of older individuals.
Periodicals
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology (published quarterly by
Kluwer AcadeMic Publishers). Anthropology Library (UC Berkeley) (HQ1060.J68).
Journal of Minority Aging (published semi-annually by the National
Council on Black Aging). Social Welfare Library (UC
Berkeley) (HQ1064.U5.B4).
Audiovisual Resources
Alzheimer's: A Multicultural Perspective
Running time: 34 minutes/video
ATTN: Andrew Scharlach
School of Social Welfare
329 Haviland
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
(510) 642-0126
This tape examines the experience of caring for an elderly relative through
the eyes of four families: Chinese, Japanese, Latino, and Vietnamese. The
stories portray some of the difficulties families can experience when traditional
cultural values conflict with majority societal norms and the pressures
of daily life. Included is a discussion of services available to assist
families caring for someone with Alzheimer's Disease, as well as potential
barriers to service utilization. Produced by the School of Social Work at
San Jose State University.
Geriatric Assessment: A Functionally Oriented, Ethnically Sensitive Approach
to the Older Patient Running time: 20 minutes/video
(1990) Stanford Geriatric Education Center
703 Welch Rd., Suite H-1
Stanford, CA 94305
(415) 723-7063
An introductory video designed to acquaint the learner with the concepts
underlying assessment of the geriatric patient using formal instruments
in different domains of function. The tape demonstrates four patients of
differing ethnic/racial groups in four separate health care settings.
Responsive Health Care for Minority Elderly
Running time: 38 minutes/video
University of Maryland - Video
Services Dept. of Physical Therapy
32 S. Greene Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
(301) 528-7720
A series of actual patient interviews demonstrates the need for health professionals
working with elderly minority patients to expand the traditional concept
of assessment to include psychosocial, cultural, educational, economic,
and environmental factors. Emphasized is the importance of integrating the
patient into the health care system, patient education and preventive medicine.
African American Elderly
Demographic Overview
There are approximately two million African Americans age 65 or older in
the U.S., representing about 8% of the African American population. The
African American elderly population has been increasing at a rate almost
twice that of the African American population as a whole. This rate of growth
also exceeds that of the general elderly population. It is estimated that,
by the year 2050, the number of elderly African Americans could nearly quadruple
to more than nine million persons, representing 15% of all African Americans.
Increasing percentages of elderly persons are primarily a result of declining
death and birth rates, which act together to bring about an increase in
the number and proportion of elderly. The percentage of elderly remains
lower in the African American population than in the white population because
death and birth rates, though declining, still are higher than in the white
population (Cowgill, 1988).
Life Expectancy and the Crossover Phenomenon
African Americans continue to have shorter life expectations than does the
white majority. The estimated life expectancy for African American men is
67.7 and for African American women is 75, considerably lower than the 72.7
and 79.6 years estimated for their white counterparts (AARP, 1987). Possible
reasons for this shorter lifespan include poverty, dramatic health status
differences, and reduced access to health care services.
Despite lower life expectancies for African Americans from birth, a mortality
crossover phenomenon occurs at age 73 for black males and age 85 for black
females, whereby African American elders that reach these ages tend to live
longer than their white contemporaries. Although there are no definitive
answers explaining this crossover, one suggestion is that high early mortality
selects the least hardy African American individuals, producing among the
older cohort a disproportionate population of more hardy persons. Another
possible explanation is that many African American elders have had to cope
with stress and few economic resources throughout their lifetime; therefore,
negative outcomes in old age may appear less serious or the elder may simply
have developed a more reliable set of coping strategies to deal with the
stresses of old age (Greene & Siegler, 1984).
Socioeconomic Situation
African American elders tend to have significantly lower socioeconomic status
than do white elders. In 1990 the median income for urban African American
elderly men was $7078 versus $13,745 for urban white elderly men. Urban
African American older women earned an average of only $5,555 while white
elderly women's earnings averaged $9,827. In 1990, the poverty rate for
older African Americans was 30.7%, and only 9.6% for older white americans.
There are many possible reasons for the high poverty rate among African
American elders, including inadequate education, discrimination in hiring
and rates of pay, work histories of low wage jobs, and high unemployment
resulting in lower Social Security and private pension plan coverage.
With regard to educational background, the proportion of high school graduates
is substantially less among African Americans (17%) than among white elders
(41%). Perhaps even more significantly, many African American elderly never
received any formal education. Six percent of older African Americans never
attended school compared to only 2% of white elderly (AARP, 1987).
Discrimination is another important contributor to the high rates of poverty
experienced by African American elders who often were denied access to jobs
commensurate with their experience and capabilities. Moreover, minority
elders often were (and are) paid lower salaries than their white counterparts
for the same job responsibilities (Manuel, 1982). Low wage jobs not only
provide less of an income from which to save for one's retirement, they
are also much less likely to be covered by a private pension. In addition,
low paying jobs form the least stable part of the labor market, leaving
workers in these jobs more vulnerable to unemployment.
Frequent and extended periods of unemployment and underemployment do not
just provide immediate financial hardship, they also can disqualify a worker
from receiving pension benefits. To be fully insured by Social Security,
workers must be in jobs covered by Social Security for ten years. The elderly
cohort of African Americans tended to work in manual labor, domestic service,
temporary and/or part time jobs, the majority of which were not covered
by Social Security. Social Security also computes incomeless years into
an average yearly income; thus, scattered periods of unemployment can cause
a significant reduction in monthly benefits. Moreover, only 20% of African
American workers compared to 43% of white workers were covered at some point
in their work career by a private pension. Of those workers who were covered
by private pensions, only a little more than half (52%) of the African American
workers actually collected pension benefits, as compared to 77% of white
workers.
Health
African American elders tend to perceive their health as more problematic
than do white elders. Seventeen percent of African American elders rate
their health as poor, as compared with 7% of white elders. Much of this
differential in health status can be attributed to increased rates of poverty
among African American elders, lack of adequate health care throughout life,
and a greater likelihood of working at manual, physically debilitating jobs.
Moreover, older African Americans are less likely than white elders to have
health insurance or to have seen a doctor in the previous year.
A higher proportion of health problems among minority elders does not lead
to higher institutionalization rates for this population. In fact, a much
smaller percentage of African American (3%) than white elderly (5.8%) live
in nursing homes. Among the oldest population of elderly, 12% of African
Americans and 23% of whites
are institutionalized. Reasons for these differences include discrimination
in referrals to long term care services, potential social isolation, geographical
discrimination in nursing homes and shorter life expectancies (Manuel, 1982),
as well as a culturally-based ethic that elderly should be cared for by
"blood" (Carter, 1988). A strong, supportive family orientation
may have its roots in the necessity to provide care unavailable from other
sources due to the "racial discrimination and the social historical
exclusion of African Americans from public and private social welfare and
health services" (Watson, 1982, p. 145).
Family Roles
African American families have developed and retain distinctive models of
family interaction that combine traditional patterns of roles and responsibilities
with adaptations called forth by the American experience. Some of the African
American family's strengths include: strong parentchild and sibling ties;
greater likelihood of providing economic and social support to extended
family members; large proportions of family members residing within the
same neighborhood or area; care for ill and dependent family members; strong
work orientation; adaptable family roles; strong religious orientation;
and emphasis on respect for elders (Aschenbrenner, 1978, and Hill, 1972,
as cited in Brown, 1990).
The black kinship system tends to be more extensive and cohesive than the
family system of whites. The family is a mutual aid society where favors
and obligations are taken when needed from other family members and paid
back sometime in the future. Most studies comparing older African Americans
and whites suggest older African Americans more frequently interact with
their families and receive more social support from them. In addition, African
American elders are more likely to provide help and money to their adult
children (George, 1988).
African American elders are less likely than white elders to be married
and living with a spouse, however. In 1983, 27% of older African American
women compared to 40% of white women were living with their spouses, as
were 63% of African American men versus 78% of white men. This difference
is largely due to higher rates of widowhood and divorce among African American
men and women.
African American families have traditionally been structured to involve
at least three generations. It is estimated that 20% to 30% of African American
older women head a multigenerational household. Older African American women
are four times more likely than their white peers to live with young dependent
relatives under 18 years of age (Tate, 1983). The grandparents frequently
see their role as passing on the traditions and heritage of their culture
and religion. In addition, grandparents may act as surrogate parents when
parents work outside the home or are unavailable (Barresi, 1987). The African
American grandmother has held and typically retains a central role in the
family kinship system, often attempting to allocate limited family resources
to ensure that all members are adequately provided for (LesnoffCaravaglia,
1982).
There is much historical precedence for the respect of elders within the
African American family. In preslavery days, the elders were the oral historians
and the guardians of communal wisdom, customs and legends (Watson, 1982).
Traditional organization was structured around kinship groups, in which
elders had a great deal of authority and respect. Although the experience
of slavery changed the structure of the family, families still retained
their traditional importance and served to support the individual in the
hostile American environment.
Even in post-Civil War America, African American families had to adapt cultural
practices in order to deal
with prejudices and inequalities associated with widespread racism. Extended
families pooled economic resources to ensure survival and improve living
standards. Grandparents were important to provide childcare and also to
contribute to the economic viability of the extended family. In this context,
older family members maintained the position of respect and authority they
historically had held within the family. The extended matriarchal coresident
family, which describes a significant minority of African American families
today, can be perceived as a continuation of this tradition.
Social, Community And Religious Involvement
Communal support and responsibility is a central feature of the African
American community. It is not uncommon for nonrelated individuals to address
each other as kin through endearments such as "granny" or "uncle",
illustrating the closeness and importance of the bond. African Americans
tend to utilize support from friends and neighbors to a greater degree than
do whites. Even greater importance is put upon friendships for those elders
without children or spouses (Taylor, 1988).
African Americans developed distinct ethnic enclaves in reaction to racial
discrimination and segregation from the dominant society and to facilitate
support, interaction and functioning among group members. Faced with impoverished
circumstances, vulnerable to the stresses of frequent racial slurs and humiliations
from the racist majority, economic and social support systems developed
among African Americans to help community members in times of need. Historically,
the church has fulfilled numerous functions within African American communities.
It provided a political structure for helping African Americans to deal
with "social, economic, and political inequities" (George, 1988);
it instituted a mutual aid system to provide economic, emotional and spiritual
assistance to a disenfranchised population; and, it provided an opportunity
for minority elders to perform meaningful roles that were valued by their
community. In recent decades, the church has retained its prestige in the
community through the leadership position it adopted in the fight for equal
rights.
The present cohort of elderly, in both the AngloAmerican and African American
population, tends to be more religious than younger cohorts. Consequently,
elders are both the mainstay of the church and significant recipients of
its services and help. Individual members and church groups support each
other with material, emotional and spiritual assistance. Many churches have
programs to provide food and clothing and to visit the sick as well as elderly
shutins. In addition, the church plays a significant role in promoting selfworth
and selfesteem through the validation of "shared beliefs and attitudes
held by the congregation" (Taylor, 1988).
References
American Association of Retired Persons Minority Affairs Initiative (1987).
A Portrait of Older Minorities. Washington, DC: AARP. Aschenbrenner,
J. (1978). "Continuities and Variations in Black Family Structures."
In D. B. Shimkin, E. N. Shimkin and D. A. Frate (Eds.), The Extended
Family in Black Societies. Paris: Mouton Publishers.
Barresi, C. (1987). "Ethnic Aging and the Life Course." In D.
Gelfand and C. Barresi (Eds.), Ethic Dimensions of Aging (pp. 18-34).
New York: Springer.
Carter, J. J. (1988). "Health Attitudes/Promotions/Preventions: The
Black Elderly." In J. S. Jackson (Ed.), The Black American Elderly.
New York: Springer.
Cowgill, D. O. (1988). "Aging in CrossCultural Perspective: Africa
and the Americas." In E. Gort (Ed.), Aging in CrossCultural Perspective.
New York: Phelps Stokes Fund.
Davis, L. G. (1989). The Black Aged in the United States: A Selectively
Annotated Bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
George, L. K. (1988). "Social Participation in Later Life: Black-White
Differences." In J. S. Jackson (Ed.), The Black Elderly: Research
on Physical and Psychosocial Health. New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Greene, R. L., & Siegler, I. C. (1984). "Blacks." In E. Palmore
(Ed.), Handbook on the Aged in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood
Press. Harel, Z., McKinney, E., & Williams, M. (Eds.). (1990). Black
Aged: Understanding Diversity and Service Needs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Publications.
Harper, M. S., & Alexander, C. (1990). "Profile of the Black Elderly."
In M. S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging: Essential Curricula Content for
Selected Health and Allied Health Professions. Health Resources and
Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication
No. HRS (PDV904). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hill, R. B. (1972). The Strengths of Black Families. New York: National
Urban League.
Jackson, J. J. (1985). "Race, National Origin and Ethnicity."
In R. H. Binstock and E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social
Sciences (2nd Ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
LesnoffCaravaglia, G. (1982). "The Black 'Granny' and the Soviet 'Babushka':
Commonalities and Contrasts." In R. Manuel (Ed.), Minority Aging:
Sociological and Psychological Issues. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Manuel, R., & Reid, J. (1982). "A Comparative Demographic Profile
of the Minority and Nonminority Aged." In R. Manuel (Ed.), Minority
Aging: Sociological and Psychological Issues. Westport, CT: Greenwood
Press.
Markides, K. S. (1983). "Minority Aging." In M. White Riley, B.
B. Hess and K. Bond (Eds.), Aging in Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Peterson, J. (1990). "Age of Wisdom: Elderly Black Women in Family
and Church." In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The Cultural Context of Aging.
New York: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.
Robinson Brown, D. (1990). "The Black Elderly: Implications for the
Family." In M. S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging: Essential Curricula
Content for Selected Health and Allied Health Professions. Health Resources
and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS
Publication No. HRS (PDV904). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Staples, R. (1976). "The Black American Family." In C. H. Mindel
and R. W. Habenstein (Eds.), Ethnic Families in America. New York:
Elsevier Scientific.
Tate, N. (1983). "The Black Aging Experience." In R. McNeely and
J. Colen (Eds.), Aging in Minority Groups. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Taylor, R. J. (1988). "Aging and Supportive Relationships Among Black
Americans." In J. S. Jackson (Ed.), The Black Elderly: Research
on Physical and Psychosocial Health. New York: Springer.
Watson, W. H. (1982). Aging and Social Behavior: An Introduction to Social
Gerontology. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth Health Sciences Division.
African American Elderly
Based on an interview with Charlotte Perry
Medical Anthropology Department
UC San Francisco
What term do African American elders use to identify themselves?
Many folks in the African American community at this time use the term "African-American."
They also use "Black" and, at times, they use "Colored."
What is the popular image of African American elders?
If there would be a popular image of the African-American elder, I suppose
it would be one of a grandparent surrounded by great-grandchildren, perhaps
cooking, or enjoying television shows. What is close to reality is that
a good many of them are female. They are widowed and they live alone in
single family homes, public housing, or apartment dwellings. In many cases
they have friends as substitutes for families. A good number of the oldest
women have outlived their children.
What divisions exist among African American elderly?
The African-American elderly population is as heterogeneous as the older
majority white population. Some are middle class and living in a couple
relationship. They are involved in friendship relationships with other couples,
have their own type of social activities, go to senior citizen events, etc.
And then you see the other side of the picture. A good number of them are
widows who live alone, perhaps having become childless because their children
have died, and who develop substitute friends or family roles in their social
networks.
How do African American elders feel about aging?
Many of the oldest old, who are 85 years and older, think that they are
doing better health-wise than friends their age. They feel that they are
better off economically. They even describe themselves as being better off
compared to what they expected to be at this age. But, overall they don't
see themselves as a particularly disadvantaged group.
What is the primary social role of the African American elder?
The younger old are more involved in senior activities. For instance, one
particular group is involved in creating a senior university to teach empowerment
skills so they can become more involved in the legislative process and have
some impact on the political process. That particular group, aged 65 to
74 years, is very active in community centers and senior centers. Whereas
the older old, those 85 and older, tend to be involved in a central residential
grouping (if they are living in public housing or congregate housing), or
else they are more withdrawn. They are not reaching out for other kinds
of activities. They may be involved in church but beyond church and maybe
a couple of organizations they are not as involved as the younger old.
African American families perceive disabilities as part of the aging process.
The greatest challenge that is facing older African Americans today is long
term care. I think it's a very common philosophy among African American
families not to put seniors into nursing homes. Yet, as a middle-aged generation,
we are not prepared with the financial and person resources to take care
of them in the home.
In the cohort of the oldest old, it is surprising that a good number of
them are childless. They were in the childbearing age during the depression
and some of them chose not to become parents because of the economic picture
at the time. And then others have outlived their children and so they are
also childless.
What theories best describe how African Americans respond to the aging
process? In terms of theories that describe African American aging the
best model that I have seen thus far entails the aging process but it goes
beyond that. I like to use Kahn and Antonucci's "Convoy of Social Support"
approach in looking at older African Americans because it takes into consideration
the lifespan approach, looking at their roles over their lifespan, personal
characteristics, situational characteristics, support structure, and support
functions. It incorporates role theory, continuity theory and interaction
theory.
How do African American elders differ from elders of other ethnic groups?
One of the differences between African Americans and older white Americans
has been the whole notion of social support. African Americans tend to take
on friends and see them as part of the family network. In that network,
friends may become the providers of expressive or instrumental support,
which I find to be very different from older white Americans. For the latter,
if it's not family and it's not spouse, then it may not be anyone. The literature
says that Hispanics are more family-based, tend to keep connected over the
years, and may even live in extended family situations. Whereas, older African
Americans have moved away from that model. They are now in what we, as researchers,
term the "modified extended model," and many families have incorporated
either friends or fictive kin.
What are the greatest service needs of African American elders?
The major health and support service needs of older African Americans
are something better than Medicare and the Medicare gap insurance, such
as the senior HMOs with a cap on out-of- pocket expenses. As far as social
support, I think the United States social policy should move to compensating
those families that provide long-term care in a community setting, as opposed
to institutionalization. There should be some monetary compensation to shore
up the efforts of family and friends. I did a study in the Southeastern
part of the United States of a large group of widows living in subsidized
housing. The widows who were "weller" (for lack of a better term)
were in fact taking care of those in the housing complex that weren't as
well. The housing complex management took no responsibility for making assessments
on health status beyond the initial application that showed that applicants
were able to manage their daily lives. People didn't come forth and say,
"Well, now I'm unable to do this," because if they did, they would
no longer be able to live there. What we found was that younger widows were
taking care of those who were frail.
What do students most need to understand about African American elders?
The major message I would send
to new students in the area, would be to learn as much as they can about
the culture. Then they would best understand the ways of some of the older
African American adults. If we're thinking about health in this large group,
some practice folk medicine. They also take over-the-counter drugs with
prescription medications. There is also a strong spiritual belief. A good
many of them leave everything up to God. I ask them whom they trust in and
they say, "it's God." And I ask who is their confidante and they
will say, "He is the one." We really need more African American
researchers to conduct research with older African Americans. Research is
needed in all areas, across the board. If I were to pick any particular
area, I would say we need more research in family support and health care
delivery. We need more individuals to serve this community in social work
and public administration, for housing developments, senior centers, adult
day care centers, and other community services.
Suggested Readings
African-American Elderly
Gibson, Rose C. (1986). Blacks in an Aging Society. Daedalus, 115,
349-371. This chapter addresses the social problems facing African American
teenagers, middle-aged and elderly, as our population ages, as well as the
implications they pose for society as a whole. The author uses census data
to identify and summarize such critical issues as health care, shrinking
federal funds, education, poverty and retirement among African Americans.
Greene, Ruth L., & Siegler, Ilene C. (1984). "Blacks." In
Erdman Palmore (Ed.), Handbook on the Aged in the United States (pp.
219-233). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. This chapter provides a concise
introductory overview on Afro-American elders in the United States. A cohort
historical analysis is done contextualizing the experience of the elderly
through the Segregation era and Civil Rights era. Social and economic characteristics
are discussed including population, education, labor force participation,
income, and poverty. Coping, adaptation and mental health are also discussed
and several research issues are presented.
Harel, Zev, McKinney, Edward, & Williams, Michael. (Eds.). (1990). Black
Aged: Understanding Diversity and Service Needs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
This book is of particular use for health care and social welfare service
providers to Afro-American elderly. Federal social welfare policies, health
issues and diversity amongst the aged Afro-American population are discussed.
A chapter by Stewart, Gerace and Noelke provide case studies to illustrate
clinical social work practice with Afro-American elderly and their family
caregivers.
Harper, Mary S., & Alexander, Camille. (1990). "Profile of the
Black Elderly." In Mary S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging: Essential
Curricula Content for Selected Health and Allied Health Professions
(pp. 193-222). Health Resources and Services Administration, Department
of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication No. HRS (P-DV-90-4). Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of aged Afro-American's demography,
marital status, living arrangements, education, employment history, poverty
levels, and family life. A one page scenario is presented of a life history
of a 74 year old Afro-American elder.
Jackson, James S. (Ed.). (1988). The Black American Elderly: Research
on Physical and Psychological Health. New York: Springer.
This collection provides a comprehensive overview of recent research. Of
particular interest are Taylor's article on aging and supportive relationships,
George's article on social participation in later life, and Carter's article
on health issues.
Peterson, Jane. (1990). "Age of Wisdom: Elderly Black Women in Family
and Church." In Jay Sokolovsky (Ed.), The Cultural Context of Aging
(pp. 213-228). New York: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.
This readable chapter is an anthropological study of an Afro-American great-grandmother.
Through this woman's life-story, the importance of family and religion for
many older Afro-American women is richly portrayed. The roles of elderly
women discussed by the author include creating relationships, teaching values,
helping raise children, being religious role models, and supporting fellow
church members. This article will generate class discussion on the role
of Afro-American Elders in the Afro-American community.
Richarson, Julee. (1990). Aging and Health: Black American Elders.
Stanford, CA: Stanford Geriatric Education Center.
This monograph provides a concise but comprehensive overview of existing
knowledge regarding the physical health and well-being of older African
Americans, including information regarding morbidity, mortality, service
barriers, and health practices and beliefs. While intended for health care
providers and trainees, this review is an excellent resource for all students
interested in understanding health-related issues affecting this population.
Robinson Brown, Diane. (1990). "The Black Elderly: Implications for
the Family." In Mary S. Harper (Ed.), Minority Aging: Essential
Curricula Content for Selected Health and Allied Health Professions
(pp. 275-295). Health Resources and Services Administration, Department
of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication No. HRS (P-DV-90-4). Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
The
author discusses the structure, organization and importance of the family
for Afro-American elders. Relationships within Afro-American families and
the family impact on the elder's interaction in the community are also discussed.
Audiovisual Resources
Family Counseling with an Older Black Family
Running time: 15 minutes/video
ATTN: Professor Andrew Scharlach
School of Social Welfare
329 Haviland Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
(510) 642-0126
Created to demonstrate family counseling skills appropriate to work with
older Black families and to serve as a trigger for discussion, the tape
portrays work with an older parent and their adult children where health-related
issues have resulted in tensions and misunderstandings. The major issue
presented is the conflict between a daughter and her recently disabled mother
over the mother's desire to live among her friends, and the daughter's insistence
that she move far away to live with her. The theme is the importance of
understanding the value of the Black church and extended kin networks to
the life of many Black elderly people. Produced by the School of Social
Work at San Jose State University.
Old, Black, and Alive!
Running time: 28 minutes/film (1974)
University of California at Berkeley
Extension Media Center
2176 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, CA 94704
(510) 642-0618 or 642-0460
Seven elderly blacks share their insight, faith and strength in a compelling
documentary on aging. Aging
touches everyone. Its universality is reflected in this film with candidness
and humor. Filmed in a rural area of the south, this film shows people who
have something to say about aging. "A beautiful, thoughtful film ...
full of humor and love." (Film Library Quarterly) "A vibrant film
done with feeling and respect. An excellent addition to programs on aging,
death, black social problems, and religion." (Religious Film Newsletter).
Older, Stronger, Wiser
Running time: 28 minutes/video or film (1990)
Indiana University Audio Visual Center
Bloomington, IN 47405
(812) 335-2103
Importance of black women as foundations of community through life-long
dedications to church, eduction, and family. Profiles 5 remarkable women
who have struggled to rise above the indignities of racism that have characterized
the black experience for years.
On My Own: The Traditions of Daisy Turner
Running time: 28 minutes/video
(call # Video/C2163) Media Center,
Moffitt Library University of California at Berkeley
Presents the life of a daughter of a former slave, 102-year old Daisy Turner.
She recalls childhood incidents and her father's Civil War experiences and
talks about life in her homestead in Vermont. Folklorist Jane Beck fills
in details about traditions preserved in the Turner family.
^ TOP OF PAGE
|
 |
|